Tag: Surveillance

Cablegate

November 29, 2010:

From Wikileaks:

Wikileaks began on Sunday November 28th publishing 251,287 leaked United States embassy cables, the largest set of confidential documents ever to be released into the public domain. The documents will give people around the world an unprecedented insight into US Government foreign activities.

The cables, which date from 1966 up until the end of February this year, contain confidential communications between 274 embassies in countries throughout the world and the State Department in Washington DC. 15,652 of the cables are classified Secret.

Just as was the case with the earlier leaks of nearly 100,000 Afghanistan and nearly 400,000 Iraq war logs, there is so much info here and it is difficult to summarize — these embassy cables will be the topic of discussion and analysis for decades.

For now, I’ll just link to the coverage provided by Wikileaks’ media partners:

National Security and Surveillance State, Inc.

July 23, 2010:

Even though “alternative media” has been covering the story for years, the increasingly vast, inefficient and unaccountable post 9-11 national security and surveillance apparatus is so out of control that now even war-enabling, torture denying, neocon propaganda rags are sounding alarms about it…

The Washington Post published a three part series entitled “Top Secret America”. Part 1, focuses on the explosion of government funding on surveillance and security, Part 2 focuses on the government’s dependence on profit-driven private enterprise, and Part 3 describes one particular office park filled with (privileged and out-of-touch) spys.

Here are some of the highlights of the report:

* Some 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the United States.

* An estimated 854,000 people, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington, D.C., hold top-secret security clearances.

* In Washington and the surrounding area, 33 building complexes for top-secret intelligence work are under construction or have been built since September 2001. Together they occupy the equivalent of almost three Pentagons or 22 U.S. Capitol buildings – about 17 million square feet of space.

* Many security and intelligence agencies do the same work, creating redundancy and waste. For example, 51 federal organizations and military commands, operating in 15 U.S. cities, track the flow of money to and from terrorist networks.

* Analysts who make sense of documents and conversations obtained by foreign and domestic spying share their judgment by publishing 50,000 intelligence reports each year – a volume so large that many are routinely ignored.

Here is a map illustrating the proliferation of public and private work locations in “Top Secret America”:

The report reveals that the situation is so out of control that even Defense Secretary Gates and CIA Director Panetta worry about it in front of reporters – they admit it is out of control. But of course their interests are not the same as the rest of the country.

One of the worst things about the situation is that this secret, inefficient bureaucracy is that it is payed for by taxpayers – in a time of starving schools and home foreclosures, it is basically a jobs program designed to help out people who specialize in surveillance, killing and propaganda services to the government.

I say “one of the worst” because the worst thing is clearly this:

Relying upon profit-driven industry for the defense and intelligence community’s “core mission” is to ensure that we have Endless War and an always-expanding Surveillance State.  After all, the very people providing us with the “intelligence” that we use to make decisions are the ones who are duty-bound to keep this War Machine alive and expanding because, as the Post put it, they are “obligated to shareholders rather than the public interest.”

Above are images from some of the “anti-deception” toys developed by private “defense” contractors.

On the left, “a thermal-imaging camera to measure changes in facial temperature, which can help determine whether a person is lying. Some data suggests that a person who is lying may register a temperature increase near the inside corner of the eye. The scientists hope to use such cameras for security screenings at airports, train stations, border crossings, stadiums or large events.”

On the right, “A computer-generated avatar is being developed to test how interviewees respond to different interviewers. Scientists at the Defense Academy for Credibility Assessment (DACA) can manipulate the avatar’s physical attributes, including hair and eye color, complexion, skull and forehead shape, and even the sound of the avatar’s voice to create an interviewer of any age, race and gender.”

This is a fruitful line of research because, they claim,  “young Hispanic males have a very difficult time lying to older Hispanic females.” So, you know, if you want to do “credibility assessment” on a young Mexican man, you should make the Avatar be a older Mexican woman.

PS: Here are some follow-ups to this story:

the lack of impact this story has had, on

CONTINUITIES

March 19, 2009:

So far, there are at least 6 legal cases in which Obama’s Department of Justice has embraced Bush’s positions on civil liberties and executive power:

1. I have already posted on Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, where Obama’s DOJ sought to use the “state secrets privilege” to block (alleged) victims of rendition and torture from suing the transport company used by the CIA.

2. The Obama DOJ again invoked the state secrets privilege in the case of Al-Haramain v. Obama, this time in order to block a judicial ruling on Bush’s illegal surveillance program.

After this argument was rejected by the court Obama appealed again – this time embracing Cheney / Addington theories of executive power and asserting that no court can challenge the President’s decision to withhold classified documents.

Here is Glenn Greenwald’s exegesis:

In the context in which Obama is now invoking this theory, think about what it means:  if, as happened here, the President breaks the law,then he can just label the relevant evidence “classified” and refuse toturn it over to a court which is attempting to rule on the legality of the President’s actions.  Once the President decrees that a court isbarred from reviewing the relevant evidence because the President claims it is “classified,” that’s the end of that.

In both of the above cases, Obama adopted the Bush innovation of using the state secrets privilege to throw out entire lawsuits, rather than just sensitive pieces of evidence.

3. In the case of Al-Marri v. Spagone, Obama’s DOJ successfully blocked a Supreme Court ruling on the legality of Bush’s practice of detaining U.S. residents as “enemy combatants” indefinitely without charges or trial.

They blocked the ruling by finally bringing criminal charges against Al-Marri, and then convincing the Supreme Court that the questions regarding the legality of his 6 year detention were thereby rendered moot.

On the positive side, Al-Marri is finally getting his day in court. Here is a video update from Al-Marri’s lawyer.

4. On top of all of this, last month Obama sided with Bush in asserting that “enemy combatants” held at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan  have no rights to challenge their detention in U.S. courts.

This means that Obama’s promise to close Guantanamo becomes almost irrelevant,since detainees can now just be taken to Bagram for indefinite,extralegal detention. About 600 prisoners are now held at Bagram, and it is about to undergo a $60 million expansion. Bagram threatens to become Obama’s Guantanamo.

5.
Then there is the email case,where Obama’s DOJ is siding with the former administration in “trying to kill a lawsuit that seeks to recover what could be millions of missing White House e-mails.”

6. And finally the DNA case,where Obama’s DOJ “turned down a request… to disavow a Bush Administration stance on prisoner’s access to DNA evidence in post-conviction proceedings.”


CORPORATE HEGEMONY

August 27, 2008:


In Denver, on the eve of the Democratic National Convention, AT&T threw a party to support Democrats who voted to grant telecoms immunity for illegal domestic wiretapping. The press was prohibited from entering.

From Glenn Greenwald:

It was really the perfect symbol for how the Beltway political system functions — those who dictate the nation’s laws (the largest corporations and their lobbyists) cavorting in total secrecy with those who are elected to write those laws (members of Congress), while completely prohibiting the public from having any access to and knowledge of — let alone involvement in — what they are doing. And all of this was arranged by the corporation — AT&T — that is paying for a substantial part of the Democratic National Convention with millions upon millions of dollars,which just received an extraordinary gift of retroactive amnesty from the Congress controlled by that party…

THE ICC, THE U.S. AND MORE GENOCIDE OLYMPICS

August 20, 2008:


The International Criminal Court (ICC) has charged the President of Sudan for waging genocide against the Fur, Zaghawa and Massaleit tribes of Darfur.

The U.N. has estimated that since 2003, 300,000 have died and 2.5 million now live in refugee camps as a result of the conflict.

As of June 2008, 106 countries are States Parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC. Countries who still oppose the ICC are the United States, Israel, Libya, Sudan, and China, among others.

Although former President Clinton signed the ICC treaty on Dec. 31 2000, his successor George W. Bush “unsigned” it in 2002 — presumably in preparation for his illegal invasion of Iraq.

U.S. opposition to the ICC undermines its efforts to bring the perpetrators of genocide to justice.

Moreover, for obvious reasons, the U.S. lacks the moral credibility to criticize China for participating in the slaughter of civilians for the sake of access to energy resources.


Far from criticizing, Bush has in effect condoned China’s support for the genocide in Sudan by personally attending the Olympic Games.

Oh, and last year the U.S. State Department labeled the genocidal regime in Sudan as a “strong partner in the war on terror” for its help in spying on the Iraqi insurgency.


FISA VOTE RESULTS AND OBAMA’S BETRAYAL

July 9, 2008:

Today, Obama joined the Democrat-led Congress to immunize criminal telecommunications corporations, terminate all pending lawsuits against them, and grant vast new surveillance powers to the President. By this new law, the President may now spy on U.S. citizens without a warrant.

From Glenn Greenwald:

Obama’s vote in favor of cloture, in particular, cemented the complete betrayal of the commitment he made back in October when seeking the Democratic nomination. Back then, Obama’s spokesman — in response to demands for a clear statement of Obama’s views on the spying controversy after he had previously given a vague and noncommittal statement — issued this emphatic vow:

To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies.

But the bill today does include retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies.Nonetheless, Obama voted for cloture on the bill — the exact opposition of supporting a filibuster — and then voted for the bill itself. A more complete abandonment of an unambiguous campaign promise is difficult to imagine.

The ACLU has promised to challenge the constitutionality of this law as soon as Bush signs it.


TOMORROW’S FISA VOTE

July 8, 2008:

In 1978, in the aftermath of Nixon’s warrantless spying program, Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in order to put government surveillance programs under judicial review as required by the 4th Amendment to the Constitution.

Since spying without a warrant is unconstitutional, FISA established a special court to grant surveillance warrants. The Bush Administration broke the law by circumventing this court when it asked the telecommunications corporations for access to private communications data.

Tomorrow, the Senate is set to vote on a FISA amendment legalize Bush’s criminal spy program and also grant retroactive immunity to AT&T, Verizon and the other collaborators.

A. The House of Representatives, Money and Votes.


The FISA bill reached the Senate after passing through the House, where Representatives who switched their vote from opposing to supporting retroactive immunity received extra money from telcom political action groups.

B. OBAMA TURNS COAT.

When Senator Obama was running for the Democratic Nomination, he pledged to filibuster any move to grant retroactive immunity to the telecoms. Now that he has the nomination, he has broken his pledge and on June 25th announced that he would vote for the FISA bill even if it includes retroactive immunity.

This shocking capitulation did not go unaswered by his grassroots supporters, who formed a group called Please Vote NO on Telecom Immunity, which has become the largest on Obama’s own website.

How will Obama vote tomorrow?

Senators Dodd and Feingold have working to strip retroactive immunity from the FISA legislation. Feingold took the Senate floor today to plead with his colleagues.

How will the Senate vote tomorrow?

In recent days, Glen Greenwald has written eloquently about:

You can also listen to Daniel Ellsberg, the man who leaked to the Pentagon Papers, discuss what is at stake in tomorrow’s vote here.