Month: June 2011

Extreme Energy: Oil, Coal and Nukes.

June 26, 2011:

Power industries have resorted to extreme measures in order to produce energy for an insatiable civilization, exploiting increasingly remote crevices of the planet in the pursuit of corporate profit  — without regard to heavy environmental costs.

Below are three examples: oil from tar sands, coal from mountaintop removal, and nukes from a demonstrably unsafe and under-regulated industry.

1. Oil Extraction from Canadian Tar Sands

Tom Radford’s documentary film about oil extraction from Alberta’s Tar Sands tells the story of Canada’s sorry environmental trajectory, its obstructionism to a global climate deal, the pollution of the Athabasca River and the devastating effects on the humans and other organisms in the area.

A choice sequence from the documentary:

Narrator: In Kyoto, Canada promised to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 6%. Now, 20 years later, the tar sands are booming and the emissions are up 26%.

Bill McKibben: If you set out to devise a method to harm the planet, you couldn’t come up with a better one than what Canada is doing at the tar sands. You’ve got to bring in energy to heat this stuff up enough to get it out.  Once you spent all that energy in getting it out, then you refine it into gasoline and burn it again. If any significant portion of that tar sands continues to get exploited and burnt, then we’ll simply have too much carbon in the atmosphere

Tim Flannery: For every barrel of oil that you get from the tar sands, you release three times the as much carbon that you get form a conventional oil well in Texas or Saudi Arabia. So there is a big carbon liability… if the world followed followed Canada down that route… we would cook the earth.

2. Coal from Mountain Top Removal

Recent development from Mother Jones, on the devastating health effects of mountaintop removal mining:

A new study linking Appalachian mountaintop removal mining to birth defects offers compelling new evidence of the practice’s impact on human health..

Researchers at Washington State University and WVU pored over nearly 2 million central Appalachia birth records from 1996 to 2003. Their findings are disturbing: Kids born near mountaintop mining operations suffered higher rates of a bevy of birth defects, including central nervous system, musculoskeletal, urogenital and circulatory and respiratory problems.

I’ve posted on mountaintop removal before, and described how it saves the coal industry labor costs by simply blowing up mountains to get to the coal deposits inside.

In the process, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council,

Mining companies are clear cutting thousands of acres of some of the world’s most biologically diverse forests. They’re filling local rivers and streams with blasted debris, polluting drinking water with toxic waste and sacrificing the safety and sanctity of countless communities.

The Last Mountain“, a critically acclaimed new documentary about mountaintop removal is playing in theaters this month. Here is a promotional trailer:

BTW, if you want to find your own electric connection to mountaintop removal, here is a useful tool.

3. Disasters and Lax Safety Regulation in the Nuclear Energy Industry

Although the Fukushima disaster has largely disappeared from U.S. “news” media that prefer to giggle at pictures of pee-pees, al-Jazeera is probably right to assert that it is “much worse than you think“.

The article quotes a longtime high level nuke industry exec Arnold Gundersen who claims that “Fukushima is the biggest industrial catastrophe in the history of mankind.”

The disaster has led global support for nuclear power to subside, but in the U.S. the AP has reported on how “federal regulators have been working closely with the nuclear power industry to keep the nation’s aging reactors operating within safety standards by repeatedly weakening those standards, or simply failing to enforce them.”

Meanwhile, these doctors are suggesting a connection between Fukushima and a 35% spike in infant mortality in the U.S. pacific northwest.

Political Dickheads

June 20, 2011:


The absurd “Global War on Terror”, initiated by handlers of Supreme Court-appointed President George W. Bush in the wake of 9-11, was quickly turned into framework through which the U.S. could wage war abroad and assault civil liberties at home.

After aggressive war based on lies, secret prisons and torture, as well as illegal  spying programs on its own citizens and other blatant violations of the Bill of Rights, the Bush regime and its corporate collaborators received protection (and even “retroactive immunity”) from the leaders of the Democratic Party as soon as they came to power — upon winning the House in 2006, Nancy Pelosi infamously asserted that “impeachment is off the table” and, after winning the Presidency in 2008, Barack Obama directed the country to “look forward, not backward”.

Meanwhile, last week the hapless and narcissistic Congressman Weiner (himself an errand boy for Wall St. and AIPAC, btw) was pressured to resign by these very same Democratic Party leaders.

His offense? Sexting pictures of his dick, in violation of no laws whatsoever.

This comparison “summarizes everything one needs to know about our political culture“, suggests Glenn Greenwald.

Of course, by this point Obama has his own very good reasons for overlooking or condoning certain types of offenses while prudishly condemning others.  For the current Imperial Executive has not only continued the criminal trajectory of the Bush regime, but escalated and expanded it.

Under Obama, the Nobel Peace Warrior, the U.S. is now at war in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Yemen, with “covert” operations in Somalia and beyond.

And in terms of assaults on civil liberties, the current administration has surpassed its predecessor in radical violations of civil liberties and the rule of law — whistle blowers are targeted by the “Justice” Department, Guantanamo is still open (despite celebrated promises to close it), Bagram’s population of extra-legal prisoners grows, U.S. citizens are targeted for pretrial assassination, and new wars are started without bothering to consult Congress. And all of this is justified by means of the continued use of the dark art of Orwellian Newspeek.

UPDATE 6.22.11:

Regarding today’s expected announcement of a “troop withdrawal” from Afghanistan, ThinkProgress has posted a chart putting the numbers in context:

The “troop withdrawal” that Obama is expected to propose today will leave “far more troops in Afghanistan than it did when Obama came into office and more than at any point during former president George W. Bush’s administration.”

Public Dancing

June 13, 2011:

Consider this recent AT&T commercial:

Set in NY’s Grand Central Station, a man in a trench-coat anxiously watches the clock, tick-tock, until it strikes 12, whereupun he throws his coat to the floor and dances.  After a while he realizes that he is dancing alone, and then he gets a text — the flash mob has been moved to 12:30.

Still undercover, the other flash mobsters shake their heads at him in disappointment.

“Don’t be the last to know,” asserts the voiceover/spokesman, “Get it faster with 4G.”

Mildly amusing commercial, I suppose, abstracted from its source and function.

Seen in context, however, and particularly in relation to the recent spate of arrests and tacklings of public dancers at the Jefferson Memorial, the commercial exemplifies a disturbing trend of the corporatist hegemon.

Compare commercial fantasy with political reality:

In the ATT commercial, you have one of the most powerful corporations on earth, whose political donations and army of lobbyists tether elected officials “right” and “left” to its private interests, selling their (possibly brain-carcinogenic) tracking devices smart phones to a thoroughly consumerist populace by means of the dream of dancing publicly without being arrested and violently tackled to the ground by organic drones.

In the video of the Jefferson Memorial dancing arrests, on the other hand, you have actual human beings (including an Iraq War Vet) dancing publicly only to be arrested and violently tackled to the ground by organic drones.

These dancers were motivated by an earlier Jefferson Memorial dancing arrest, and culminated in yet another dance protest at the same site which resulted in no arrests — a mild victory for the protesters.  Perhaps too mild to celebrate, according to one fellow traveller:

If the world were watching, the reaction might be a little like mine—that US Empire continues to exact unbearable human suffering throughout the world in the name of democracy. Compared to the atrocities being committed in our names, crowing about not getting arrested for dancing at the Jefferson Memorial is supercilious and obnoxious.

Nevertheless, the comparison between the ATT fantasy and the political reality indicates the growing chasm between the relative rights of corporate and human “persons”.

Fukushima Heart?

June 5, 2011:

The Tokyo Electric Power Company has detected 4,000 millisieverts per hour at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, “the highest measured so far“. With no end in sight,  here is a brief review of the situation:

Workers have been fighting to get the plant under control since the March 11 tsunami knocked out power, destroyed backup generators and halted the crucial cooling systems for the reactors, causing the world’s worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl in 1986. Several explosions have scattered radioactive debris around the plant, and reactors are spewing radiation into the air.

Speaking of Chernobyl, below is an Oscar-winning documentary film from 2004 covering some of its long term effects, particularly on children:

Joe Giambrone, who has been collecting Chernobyl related documentaries on his political film blog, has a piece on Counterpunch summarizing what he has learned and worries about “The Future Children of Fukushima”.

Nuclear power engineer and analyst Arnie Gundersen maintains that Fukushima is worse than Chernobyl, and that an aftershock and additional damage to the Fukushima plant may require the evacuation of Tokyo.  You can here an interview here.

Meanwhile, The Obama Administration is standing by nuclear power, as Germany’s coalition government has announced a phase out of nuclear power plants by 2022.

Even in the face of such disaster and suffering, some environmentalists argue for nuclear power on the grounds that it is much better than continued reliance on fossil fuels.

I’m not convinced, but with greenhouse emissions reaching record highs, these pro-nuke arguments have some force: See longtime environmentalist Stewart Brand argue for nuclear energy in this TED debate, which took place before the Fukushima disaster.  Brand has not changed his tune, even after Fukushima (and Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island, etc.).