THE ISRAELI OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE, AIPAC AND OBAMA.

June 17, 2008:

A Palestinian child named Nisreeen hit by an Israeli rubber bullet, Occupied West Bank, 2006; An Israeli army dog attacks a woman named Yusra, March 2007; Palestinian youth with missing leg waiting for ambulance after an Israeli (counter)attack on Gaza, April 2008.

Israel has operated a military occupation of the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem since the Six Day War of 1967. That same year, the United Nations passed Security Council Resolution 242 which called for the “withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict.” Israel and its sponsor the United States have ignored the resolution, resulting in the longest military occupation in modern history.

The decades long occupation has been brutal, and fuels violence on the part of a desperate people who lack basic rights and necessities. Their situation is further exasperated by Israel’s “security walls” – also illegal according to international law – which constitute the great open air prisons within which the stateless Palestinians now live.

(For a extended look at the absurdly biased U.S. news coverage of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories, check out the 2004 documentary Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land, which you can watch online in its entirety. It is 80 minutes long, and covers such topics as the colonization of the occupied territories through Jewish settlements and the marginalization of anti-occupation voices.)

In 2005, Israel initiated a partial withdrawal from Gaza and certain parts of the Northern West Bank, even going so far as to forcibly remove Jewish settlers.

In 2006, however, after Hamas won a majority of seats in the Palestinian authority, Israel and the U.S. refused to recognize the results of what was considered to be a fair election by international observers. 41 of the 43 victorious candidates are now in Israeli prisons, and the refusal to recognize a joint Fatah-Hamas government has led to internal strife, resulting in a Gaza in the hands of Hamas. Former President Jimmy Carter has more on the Human Rights Crime in Gaza.


Obama, his new double flag pin, and a Palestinian boy sitting amongst the rubble of homes demolished by Israel, the region’s only “democracy”, whose “quest for peace” and “commitment to the rule of law” “sets an example for all when it seeks a more perfect future”.

It is within this context, and the very next day after he secured the Democrat Party’s nomination for presidential candidate, that Barack Obama joined Republican nominee John McCain and others to bow before the powerful “pro-Israel” lobby, AIPAC. You can watch Obama’s entire speech on his youtube page, but here are some of the lowlights:

1. “Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided.”

Here is one very disappointed Israeli peace activist’s reaction to Obama’s proclamation:

“Since Camp David, all Israeli governments have understood that this mantra constitutes an insurmountable obstacle to any peace process. It has disappeared – quietly, almost secretly – from the arsenal of official slogans. Only the Israeli (and American-Jewish) Right sticks to it, and for the same reason: to smother at birth any chance for a peace that would necessitate the dismantling of the settlements.”

2.”As President, I will implement a Memorandum of Understanding that provides $30 billion in assistance to Israel over the next decade – investments to Israel’s security that will not be tied to any other nation.”

Because, you know, “Israel’s security” means “ensuring Israel’s qualitative military advantage.”

Stephen Zunes, Chair of Middle Eastern Studies at University of San Francisco has this to say about Obama’s right turn:

“In his speech, Obama rejected the view that the Middle East already has too many armaments and dismissed pleas by human rights activists that U.S. aid to Israel – like all countries – should be made conditional on adherence to international humanitarian law…. Over the past three years, the ratio of Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip killed by Israeli forces relative to the number of Israeli civilians in Israel killed by Palestinians is approximately 50 to one, …[but] Obama chose only to mention the Israeli deaths and condemn Hamas… not a word about the moral culpability of Israeli government, which Amnesty International and other human rights groups have roundly criticized for launching air strikes into Gaza’s densely crowded refugee camps…”

3. “We must isolate Hamas unless and until they renounce terrorism, recognize Israel’s right to exist, and abide by past agreements. There is no room at the negotiating table for terrorist organizations.”

Zunes again:

“Despite his openness to talk with those governing Iran and North Korea, Obama emphasized his oppostion to talking to those governing the Gaza Strip, even though Hamas won a majority in the Palestinian Parliament… [and even though] a public opinion poll poll published in the leading Iraeli newspaper Haaretz showed that 64% of the Israeli population support direct negotiations between Israel and Hamas… Obama has chosen to side with the right-wing minority in opposing such talks.”

Links to other interesting essays regarding Obama:

  • Journalist Alexander Cockburn articulates the links between Obama and the weapons manufacturer General Dynamics.
  • Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration, argues that despite Obama’s questionable policies on Israel and the economy, his election to the Presidency would still be the only way to block the United States final fall into tyranny.

And, as usual, I like to highlight a creative aesthetic reaction to the Problems the World has Got. Here are a few images of U.K. artist Banksy‘s work on the separation wall:


3 Comments on THE ISRAELI OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE, AIPAC AND OBAMA.

Respond | Trackback

  1. Apap with oxycodone….

    Drug oxycodone. Crushing oxycodone….

  2. Jan Boeykens says:

    BARAK OBAMA IS A HYPOCRITE:

    November 10, 2010 – Speaking from Indonesia, Obama told reporters that he was “concerned” over Israel’s decision to build 1,300 new settlement homes in east Jerusalem, a flashpoint in the ongoing peace process, the AFP reports. According to the news service, Obama told reporters that, “This kind of activity is never helpful when it comes to peace negotiations.”
    “I’m concerned that we’re not seeing each side make the extra effort to get a breakthrough that could finally create a framework for a secure Israel living side-by-side in peace with a sovereign Palestine,” Obama added. He re-affirmed, however, that he would continue working on the peace process, despite its fragility.

    November 15, 2010 – ’U.S. President Barack Obama has praised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for urging his cabinet to accept a U.S. proposal to extend a freeze on West Bank settlement building for 90 days. Under the plan, Washington would block UN resolutions critical of Israel, and supply Israel with fighter jets worth $3 billion. The US government also promised Israel that after the 90-day moratorium, they would not seek an extension, and settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem (all of which is illegal under international law) could continue unabated.’

    Picture: Obama, his new double flag pin, and a Palestinian boy sitting amongst the rubble of homes demolished by Israel, the region’s only “democracy”.

  3. [...] So, true to capitulationist form, it took only a few days for the U.S. President to soften his already tepid position, grovelling before AIPAC just as he did the day after he clinched the Democratic nomination for President in 2008. [...]

Respond

Comments

Comments